Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016

 
Mazda CX-5
2017 - 2018
Audi Q5
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 165 HP249 HP
Torque: 210 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds6.3 seconds
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-5 engine produces 84 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.47.1
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1030 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.55 m4.66 m
Width: 1.84 m1.89 m
Height: 1.68 m1.66 m
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 506 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litres1510 litres
Mazda CX-5 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0202`400
Safety:
Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
below average

high
Audi Q5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 27 00029 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi Q5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv