Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 2017 engine produces 44 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 2017 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2017 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2017 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2017 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2017 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2017 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`135 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Mazda CX-5 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 2012 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5 2017, so Mazda CX-5 2017 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |