Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Subaru Forester 2016

 
Mazda CX-5
2017 -
Subaru Forester
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 155 HP150 HP
Torque: 196 NM198 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.8 seconds
Mazda CX-5 engine produces 5 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.2
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres60 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5Used also on Subaru XV
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.55 m4.61 m
Width: 1.84 m1.80 m
Height: 1.68 m1.74 m
Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 477 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`015
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 27 00016 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-5 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Subaru Forester has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv