Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, but torque is 164 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-5 has 138 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 32 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |