Mazda CX-5 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 94 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 174 NM less than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 has 73 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |