Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 44 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is smaller. Mazda CX-30 is 19 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`949 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |