Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda HR-V. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.0 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-30 is 10 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 393 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1456 litres | |
| Mazda CX-30 has 37 litres more trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`949 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |