Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Honda CR-V 2017

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Honda CR-V
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP160 HP
Torque: 270 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds10 seconds
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 44 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.1
Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1100 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected.

Ground clearance: 175 mm (6.9 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.59 m
Width: 1.80 m1.85 m
Height: 1.56 m1.68 m
Mazda CX-30 is smaller.
Mazda CX-30 is 19 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres497 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1110 litres
Mazda CX-30 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 296 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9692`200
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 21 80021 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • higher ground clearance
Honda CR-V has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv