Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Kia XCeed 2019

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Kia XCeed
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP136 HP
Torque: 270 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds10.1 seconds
Kia XCeed is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda CX-30 engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia XCeed, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Kia XCeed. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.04.4
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia XCeed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-30 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1130 km on highway
Kia XCeed gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.40 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.56 m1.48 m
Mazda CX-30 and Kia XCeed are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1332 litres
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda CX-30 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Kia XCeed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 74 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia XCeed, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9691`950
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 80021 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-30 has
  • roomier boot
Kia XCeed has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv