Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1585 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 21 800 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |