Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Hyundai Kona 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-30 engine produces 37 HP more power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Hyundai Kona. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used also on Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mazda CX-30 is 23 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-30 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1406 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-30 has 114 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. This could mean that the Mazda CX-30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-30 has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |