Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-30 engine produces 41 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.1
5.8
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-30 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:
51 litres
55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
1000 km in combined cycle
940 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway
1140 km on highway
Ground clearance:
175 mm (6.9 inches)
180 mm (7.1 inches)
Dimensions
Length:
4.40 m
4.39 m
Width:
1.80 m
1.81 m
Height:
1.56 m
1.59 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:
430 litres
430 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1406 litres
1585 litres
Turning diameter:
11.4 meters
10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
