Mazda CX-30 2019 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-30
2019 -
Nissan Qashqai
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.2 - 1.7

Performance

Power: 116 - 189 HP110 - 163 HP
Torque: 213 - 270 NM165 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 12.6 seconds8.9 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.43.8 - 5.8
Mazda CX-30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Mazda CX-30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches)180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.39 m
Width: 1.80 m1.81 m
Height: 1.56 m1.59 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1406 litres1598 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-30 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`986~ 1`953
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 21 80017 000
Pros and Cons:
    Nissan Qashqai has
    • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv