Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Audi Q2 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q2 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP less power than Audi Q2, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Audi Q2. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 8 cm longer than the Audi Q2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q2. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q2, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q2, so Audi Q2 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q2 has
| |