Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Nissan Juke 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 33 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 46 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 422 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 838 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`808 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
| |