Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Kamiq, but torque is 43 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`808 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |