Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Opel Mokka 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 110 - 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 270 NM | 155 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 9.7 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.0 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka. On average, a Mazda CX-3 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Opel Mokka. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |