Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Chevrolet Colorado 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 34 HP less power than Chevrolet Colorado, but torque is 80 NM more than Chevrolet Colorado. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.3 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Colorado, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 19 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Colorado, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Chevrolet Colorado has
| |