Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 | 1.9 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 360 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.0 | 8.0 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda BT-50 is 2 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Isuzu D-Max, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`067 | ~ 3`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |