Mazda BT-50 2018 vs Toyota Hilux 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 (diesel) | 2.4 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 245 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.0 | 7.0 - 7.8 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is larger. Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Hilux, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 2`934 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |