Mazda 5 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 5 and Citroen C4 Picasso have the same engine power, but Mazda 5 torque is 70 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda 5 is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1566 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 1`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |