Mazda 5 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 5 engine produces 59 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 5 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |