Mazda 5 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010

 
Mazda 5
2010 - 2015
Ford Galaxy
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP145 HP
Torque: 191 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds11.2 seconds
Mazda 5 engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Ford Galaxy.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.98.2
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 5 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mazda 5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1090 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 430'000 km500'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Galaxy engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years18 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 6Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford S-Max
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Galaxy might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.82 m
Width: 1.75 m1.88 m
Height: 1.62 m1.76 m
Mazda 5 is smaller.
Mazda 5 is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 15 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 112 litres390 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 112 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1485 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1252`415
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 520010 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Galaxy has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv