Mazda 5 2010 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 5 engine produces 9 HP more power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Chevrolet Orlando. Thanks to more power Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Mazda 5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 430'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Orlando engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda 5 is smaller. Mazda 5 is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 112 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 112 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | 458 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 346 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 1027 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 5 has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |