Mazda 5 2010 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011

 
Mazda 5
2010 - 2015
Chevrolet Orlando
2011 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP141 HP
Torque: 191 NM176 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds11.6 seconds
Mazda 5 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 5 engine produces 9 HP more power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Chevrolet Orlando. Thanks to more power Mazda 5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.7 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Mazda 5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1080 km on highway
680 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 430'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Orlando engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 6Used also on Chevrolet Cruze
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.65 m
Width: 1.75 m1.88 m
Height: 1.62 m1.63 m
Mazda 5 is smaller.
Mazda 5 is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 5 is 2 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 112 litres458 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 112 litres458 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1485 litres458 litres
In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 346 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 1027 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 5 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando, which means Mazda 5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1252`160
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 52005800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Chevrolet Orlando has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv