Mazda 323 2001 vs Mercedes E class 2003

 
Mazda 323
2001 - 2003
Mercedes E class
2003 - 2006
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.1 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 100 HP122 HP
Torque: 230 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds12 seconds
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 323 engine produces 22 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 323 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km6.2 l/100km
By specification Mazda 323 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1350 km on highway
880 km with real consumption1040 km with real consumption
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 323) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 6 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda PremacyInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes Vito
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Mazda 323 is smaller.
Mazda 323 is 57 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 323 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litres540 litres
Mazda 323 has 185 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 323 (by 460 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mazda 323 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6502`135
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Mazda 323 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Mazda 323 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 8003000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • timing belt engine
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv