Mazda 323 2001 vs Mazda 323 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 71 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
Mazda 323 2001 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 323 2001 engine produces 29 HP more power than Mazda 323 1998, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Mazda 323 1998. Thanks to more power Mazda 323 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.5 | |
The Mazda 323 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 323 2001 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323 1998, which means that by driving the Mazda 323 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Mazda 323 2001 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Mazda 323 2001 is 21 cm longer than the Mazda 323 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 2001 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 304 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1000 litres | no data | |
Mazda 323 2001 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 323 2001 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323 1998. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 2001 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 323 1998, which means Mazda 323 2001 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 323 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |