Mazda 323 1998 vs Mazda 323 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.01.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 72 - 114 HP71 - 88 HP
Torque: 108 - 220 NM108 - 132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 16.9 seconds11.8 - 16.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.1 - 9.06.5 - 8.4
Mazda 323 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323 1998. On average, Mazda 323 1998 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323 1998.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.04 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Mazda 323 1998 is 16 cm longer than the Mazda 323 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 323 1998 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres304 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1000 litresno data
Mazda 323 1998 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 323 1998 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323 1998.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 323 1998 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 323 1998, which means Mazda 323 1998 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`649~ 1`595
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 323 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv