Mazda 3 2006 vs Nissan Tiida 2007

 
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Nissan Tiida
2007 - 2011
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 156 HP126 HP
Torque: 203 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.4 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Nissan Tiida, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Tiida.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.47.8
The Nissan Tiida is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 44 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 460 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
540 km on highway800 km on highway
Nissan Tiida gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years20 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda TributeUsed also on Nissan Cube
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.30 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.53 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 3 is 19 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 413 litres272 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1285 litres467 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 141 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 818 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Tiida, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`735
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 24003600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Nissan Tiida has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv