Mazda 3 2006 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007

 
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2007 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 156 HP359 HP
Torque: 203 NM492 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds4.1 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 203 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 289 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.414.2
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 44 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 460 km in combined cycle380 km in combined cycle
540 km on highway520 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 16 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda TributeUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.50 m
Width: 1.76 m1.81 m
Height: 1.47 m1.48 m
Mazda 3 is smaller.
Mazda 3 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 413 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1285 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): no data2`040
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 240026 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv