Mazda 3 2006 vs Mazda 3 2003

 
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 156 HP150 HP
Torque: 203 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9 seconds
Mazda 3 2006 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda 3 2003, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mazda 3 2003.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.2
The Mazda 3 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2006 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 2006 could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 44 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 460 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
540 km on highway870 km on highway
Mazda 3 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda TributeInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.49 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 413 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1285 litres675 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2006 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2003, which means Mazda 3 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`725
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 24001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv