Mazda 3 2007 vs Honda Civic 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Mazda 3 engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 185 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 5 | Used also on Honda FR-V | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 and Honda Civic are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 390 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | no data | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 23 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |