Mazda 3 2006 vs Mazda 3 2003

 
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 187 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds9 seconds
Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.2
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway870 km on highway
670 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years13 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.49 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 413 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1285 litres675 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2006 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2003, which means Mazda 3 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`725
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 24001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv