Mazda 3 2006 vs Nissan Tiida 2007

 
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Nissan Tiida
2007 - 2011
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 109 HP105 HP
Torque: 245 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Tiida, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Nissan Tiida.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1100 km on highway
910 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.30 m
Width: 1.76 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.53 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 3 is 19 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 413 litres272 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1285 litresno data
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 141 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Tiida.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Tiida, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8101`715
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 24003600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv