Mazda 3 2003 vs Chevrolet Nubira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 17 HP less power than Chevrolet Nubira, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Chevrolet Nubira. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Nubira gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Nubira, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
675 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Nubira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`193 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Chevrolet Nubira has
| |