Mazda 3 2006 vs Audi A3 2008

 
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 109 HP125 HP
Torque: 240 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds9.6 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 16 HP less power than Audi A3, but torque is 40 NM more than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.86.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1100 km on highway
910 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.29 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Mazda 3 is 13 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
635 litres1104 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 469 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8251`845
Safety:
Quality:
high

high
Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A3, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 18006400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv