Mazda 3 2019 vs Audi A3 2020

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
Audi A3
2020 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 186 HP150 HP
Torque: 252 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.4 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 36 HP more power than Audi A3, but torque is 108 NM less than Audi A3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.63.9
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 555 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle1280 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway1350 km on highway
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.34 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 569 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1019 litres1200 litres
Mazda 3 has 189 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`960
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 21 00021 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv