Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 3 2007

 
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Mazda 3
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP143 HP
Torque: 360 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 3 2009 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 2009 engine produces 7 HP more power than Mazda 3 2007, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.0
The Mazda 3 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 2009 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2007, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1010 km on highway
Mazda 3 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2007 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 2007 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.49 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 2009 is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2007, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Mazda 3 2009 has 17 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2007.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2009 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2007, which means Mazda 3 2009 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9551`925
Safety:
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 36002400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv