Mazda 3 2009 vs Honda Accord 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 167 HP | 201 HP | |
Torque: | 228 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Mazda 3 engine produces 34 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 36 NM more than Honda Accord. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.6 | |
Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 3 is 13 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 464 litres | |
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 129 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |