Mazda 3 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mazda 3 engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.4 | |
| Mazda 3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |