Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 6 2009

 
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Mazda 6
2009 - 2010
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 185 HP163 HP
Torque: 400 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds9.2 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 22 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.6
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1330 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.71 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 3 is 25 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litres1751 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 165 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 391 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9652`135
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
high

above average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 42003000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv