Mazda 3 2019 vs BMW 3 series 2018

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
BMW 3 series
2018 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 116 HP190 HP
Torque: 270 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds6.8 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 74 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km6.1 l/100km
By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway970 km on highway
860 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 360'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years10 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.71 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres480 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9142`085
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 14 80034 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv