Mazda 3 2019 vs Audi A3 2020

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
Audi A3
2020 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP150 HP
Torque: 213 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds8.4 seconds
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 28 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.1
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1160 km on highway
790 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.34 m
Width: 1.80 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 is 12 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1019 litres1200 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 181 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8751`830
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 21 00021 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher safety
Audi A3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv