Mazda 3 2013 vs Toyota Corolla 2013

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Toyota Corolla
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP122 HP
Torque: 150 NM157 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds10.5 seconds
Mazda 3 engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.6
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1010 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)125 mm (4.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 11 years18 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 2Used also on Toyota Auris
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.62 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres452 litres
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla.
Turning diameter: 10.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`800
Safety:
The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 11 6009200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • better safety assist technologies
Toyota Corolla has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv