Mazda 3 2006 vs Ford Focus 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 260 HP | 80 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 380 NM | 124 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | 9.3 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.7 | 4.5 - 8.0 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | 931 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 124 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 354 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 1`822 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |