Mazda 3 2003 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 150 HP | 90 - 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 245 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.4 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.2 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 473 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
675 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`718 | ~ 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |