Mazda 3 2003 vs Ford Focus 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 150 HP | 75 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 245 NM | 123 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.4 seconds | 9.3 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.2 | 5.1 - 9.4 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
675 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 77 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`718 | ~ 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |