Mazda 3 2003 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 150 HP | 90 - 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 245 NM | 120 - 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 12.4 seconds | 9.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.2 | 6.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 3 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
675 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`718 | ~ 1`572 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |