Mazda 3 2003 vs Opel Astra 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Opel Astra
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.31.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 84 - 160 HP80 - 200 HP
Torque: 122 - 245 NM125 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 14.3 seconds7.9 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 8.24.9 - 9.4
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.25 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 20 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
878 litres1330 litres
Mazda 3 has 101 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 452 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`728~ 1`799
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 12001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv