Mazda 3 2003 vs Ford Focus 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 160 HP | 80 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 245 NM | 124 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 14.3 seconds | 6.8 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.2 | 4.7 - 9.3 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
878 litres | 1247 litres | |
| Mazda 3 has 96 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 369 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`728 | ~ 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |