Mazda 3 2003 vs Peugeot 207 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Peugeot 207
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.31.4 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 84 - 160 HP68 - 120 HP
Torque: 122 - 245 NM98 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 14.3 seconds9.6 - 15.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 8.24.5 - 7.0
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 207. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.03 m
Width: 1.76 m1.72 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 is 42 cm longer than the Peugeot 207, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
878 litres923 litres
Mazda 3 has 211 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 207. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 207 (by 45 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 207.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`728~ 1`665
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Average price (€): 12002000
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 6.8/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Peugeot 207 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv